Journal on Contemporary Issues of Law

Case Comment: Upendra Kumar v. Don Finance Corporation

Publication Information

Authors: Kabir Chichiriya
Journal: Journal on Contemporary Issues of Law
Volume: 7
Issue: 11
ISSN: 2455-4782
Published On: 15/11/2021

Citation for this Article

Kabir Chichiriya, Case Comment: Upendra Kumar v. Don Finance Corporation, Volume 7, Journal on Contemporary Issues of Law , 1-6, Published on 15/11/2021, Available at https://jcil.lsyndicate.com/case-comment-upendra-kumar-v-don-finance-corporation/

Abstract

The Banking Regulation Act prohibits any co-operative society to engage in the business of banking, unless it has obtained a license and is registered with the Reserve Bank of India. It is also mandated that such co-operative societies shall use the words ‘bank’, ‘banker’, or ‘banking’ in its name in order to carry on its banking business. However, the Negotiable Instruments Act states that any person/ artificial person involved in the banking business shall be deemed to be a banker.

These provisions of the two statutes seem to be in conflict, hence, the Judiciary interpreted them with the principle of harmonious construction of statutory interpretation. The rule of harmonious interpretation hold that they should be interpreted so that each has a separate effect, and neither is redundant or nullified. Therefore, when it comes to Negotiable Instruments Act, the court has a wide ambit in relation to who can be considered as a banker.

Keywords: Negotiable Instruments, Banking Regulation Act, Reserve Bank of India, Banker

Share this research

CC

This article is licensed under CC 4.0

© 2016 - 2022 All Rights Reserved by Legal Syndicate Publishing House

Scroll to Top